
This five-part series explores the current state of passkeys and why enhanced implementations, what we call Passkeys+, are essential for meeting the security and compliance demands of bank-grade use cases.
For decades, passwords were the default key to the digital world. Easy to implement and familiar to users, they offered convenience, but at a steep cost. As our digital footprints grew, passwords became both a security liability and a user burden. Complex requirements, frequent resets, and rampant reuse opened the floodgates to breaches, phishing attacks, and endless frustration.
To fill the gap, two-factor authentication (2FA), often in the form of one-time passcodes (OTPs), became standard. But these too were riddled with flaws. Attackers could intercept SMS messages, exploit social engineering tactics, or hijack synced devices. Users were caught in a never-ending loop of friction without assurance.
That’s when passkeys arrived.
The breakthrough began with WebAuthn, a web standard developed by the FIDO Alliance and W3C. WebAuthn introduced a public-key cryptography framework that replaced "what you know" (like a password) with "what you have" (a device) and "what you are" (a biometric or PIN). This shifted authentication away from secrets and toward possession and presence.
Soon after, Apple, Google, and Microsoft integrated passkey support across their platforms:
These changes made passkeys natively available to billions of devices, but infrastructure alone wasn’t enough. The real test was adoption.
Public-key cryptography has existed for decades. What changed?
It took years of behind-the-scenes alignment — usability research, platform cooperation, and developer readiness — to reach this point. Building secure authentication is hard. Building one people will actually use is harder.
Passkeys aren’t just a better password. They’re a fundamental rewrite of how authentication works:
This usability-security combo is rare. Passkeys reduce friction while improving protection — something most security tools fail to achieve simultaneously.
Support from Apple, Google, and Microsoft laid the foundation, but 2025 marks a turning point in real-world passkey adoption.
Just two years ago, fewer than 2% of global consumer logins used passkeys. That number is now growing rapidly as passkeys transition from a novelty to a norm—particularly in ecosystems with strong platform support and intuitive user flows.
The password isn’t gone. But its reign is clearly ending. Passkeys aren’t the future anymore—they’re the present.
Why Financial Services Need Passkeys+
Default passkeys deliver a strong upgrade over passwords but for financial services, that’s only the starting point.
Banks, wallets, lenders, payment providers, and stablecoin payment and adjacent companies operate in high-risk, high-regulation environments. To fully replace outdated methods like SMS OTPs or app-based codes, passkeys need enhancements that go beyond the default spec.
This is where Passkeys+ comes in: an upgraded model designed specifically for financial use cases.
These controls don’t just improve security—they enable passkeys to be used in real money movement, customer onboarding, and risk-sensitive workflows without sacrificing user experience.
Passkeys+ is how financial platforms make modern, invisible authentication bank-grade—not just secure, but trusted enough to power the future of finance.
Passkeys are the new foundation for digital identity. The old playbook, built around passwords and OTPs, is no longer sufficient for a connected world.
To reach full potential, we need:
In just over two years, we’ve gone from technical concept to platform ubiquity. Now comes the most critical phase: mainstream adoption.
At Ideem, we’re building on this new foundation, extending the core capabilities of passkeys to meet the visibility, control, and assurance standards that financial services demand. Our approach enhances what passkeys already do well, while adding the device integrity, session confidence, and compliance-ready tooling that banks, wallets, and payment platforms need.